Nikon D200 vs D2Hs comparison

		Nikon D200	Nikon D2Hs

	Overview, Reviews	Overview, Reviews
What people say	D2Hs Vs. D200 [Page 1] D200 gets more actual resolution, D2Hs gets plenty of detail (I think it resolves at least as much as the D70/50, perhaps more), D2Hs does better at high ISO (though more options like the D200 has for high ISO NR would be nice), D200 really is superb though.... Personally, the fps and high ISO of the D2Hs make it far more useful to me than the D200.... forums.dpreview.com D2Hs vs D200 [Page 1] I shoot real events all the time, and at ISO 320 D200 images are clean, and if you downsample them to 4MP, they are much sharper and cleaner than D2Hs... from ISO 200 - 800 Ive found the D200 images look more natural, and more "film" like where as the D2Hs images come out a bit more Contrasty, and plasticy.... forums.dpreview.com D2Hs vs D200 [Page 2] PS, I'll be posting a full noise comparison later today between the D200, and D2Hs... (4) The D2Hs obviously does not have the detail resolution of the D200, and though it does a remarkable job with its pixel count, the D200 will always pick out better detail given good light and unhurried working conditions.... forums.dpreview.com D2hs vs D200 - Preferred if money is no issue? [Page 1] If you want to blow your pictures up really big, then the D200's extra pixels might be the better decision.... if the D200 is not even close to the D2Hs quality it will go back.... forums.dpreview.com Add to: Digg del.icio.us Reddit Google
Discuss here

How they stack up
	FEATURE
	Effective pixels	10.0 million	4.0 million
	ISO rating	up to 3200 as boost)	up to 3 EV steps
	Weight (inc. batteries)	920 g (32.5 oz)	1150 g (40.6 oz)
	Dimensions	147 x 113 x 74 mm (5.8 x 4.5 x 2.9 in)	158 x 150 x 86 mm (6.2 x 5.9 x 3.4 in)
	Sensor size	23.6 x 15.8 mm	23.7 x 15.5 mm (Nikon DX)
	Both have:	aperture priority, shutter priority, 1.5 focal length multiplier, TTL viewfinder, compact flash (type I or II) storage types
	Both do not have:	image stabilization, movie clips

Nikon D200

Nikon D2Hs

What people say

D2Hs Vs. D200 [Page 1]
D200 gets more actual resolution, D2Hs gets plenty of detail (I think it resolves at least as much as the D70/50, perhaps more), D2Hs does better at high ISO (though more options like the D200 has for high ISO NR would be nice), D200 really is superb though.... Personally, the fps and high ISO of the D2Hs make it far more useful to me than the D200....
forums.dpreview.com

D2Hs vs D200 [Page 1]
I shoot real events all the time, and at ISO 320 D200 images are clean, and if you downsample them to 4MP, they are much sharper and cleaner than D2Hs... from ISO 200 - 800 Ive found the D200 images look more natural, and more "film" like where as the D2Hs images come out a bit more Contrasty, and plasticy....
forums.dpreview.com

D2Hs vs D200 [Page 2]
PS, I'll be posting a full noise comparison later today between the D200, and D2Hs... (4) The D2Hs obviously does not have the detail resolution of the D200, and though it does a remarkable job with its pixel count, the D200 will always pick out better detail given good light and unhurried working conditions....
forums.dpreview.com

D2hs vs D200 - Preferred if money is no issue? [Page 1]
If you want to blow your pictures up really big, then the D200's extra pixels might be the better decision.... if the D200 is not even close to the D2Hs quality it will go back....
forums.dpreview.com

Add to: Digg del.icio.us Reddit Google