![]() Camera Comparisons |
|
Comparison of the Nikon D200 and D2H
|
|
Nikon D200 |
Nikon D2H |
||
| Overview, Reviews | Overview, Reviews | ||
What people say |
D2H vs D200 [Page 1] I find it hard to believe that the D200 would be a better camera than the D2H, considering I paid $3100 for it and the D200 is $1300.... With a D2H or a D200 (or D70 for that matter), when you move out of the lens sweet spot it can be more obvious than it was on film.... forums.dpreview.com
Nikon Forum: Nikon D2h vs. D200
D200 VS D2H(undred)
Add to: |
||
| Discuss here | |||
| FEATURE | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Effective pixels | 10.0 million | 4.0 million | |
ISO rating | up to 3200 as boost) | up to 3 EV steps | |
Weight (inc. batteries) | 920 g (32.5 oz) | 1150 g (40.6 oz) | |
Dimensions | 147 x 113 x 74 mm (5.8 x 4.5 x 2.9 in) | 158 x 150 x 86 mm (6.2 x 5.9 x 3.4 in) | |
Sensor size | 23.6 x 15.8 mm | 23.7 x 15.5 mm (Nikon DX) | |
| Both have: | aperture priority, shutter priority, 1.5 focal length multiplier, TTL viewfinder, compact flash (type I or II) storage types | ||
| Both do not have: | image stabilization, movie clips | ||
The D200 vs:
Nikon D80
Canon 30D
Canon 5D
Nikon D70s
Nikon D50
Nikon D2Hs
Nikon D2X
Fujifilm S3
The D2H vs:
Nikon D200
Nikon D2Hs
Nikon D2X
Nikon D70
Nikon D1X
Often compared:
D80 vs K10D
400D vs D80
D80 vs A100
30D vs 400D
D200 vs D80
D40 vs D50